Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BeccaT's avatar

When I went to BYU in the mid 80s, my on-campus job only paid $88 every other week. At one point, I had two extra jobs just so I could eat. My parents scrounged the money to pay my tuition, but I had to cover rent, food, and books (English major w/ $800 book fee some semesters). The pressure was high, even then, for girls to serve missions. I knew that was too big of an ask of my parents. And I couldn’t save, even with 2-3 jobs, as a full-time student. Maybe that’s why I have such a negative, visceral reaction to the church’s cheap abuse of members’ time and talents while it spends millions on lawyers, land, and luxury apartment buildings.

Expand full comment
Laurie Nord's avatar

If the mission is not free, I think the medical costs that are a result of physical and mental injury that is incurred while in the church's full time employ should be covered. We paid 100% of our four son's missions. Each one returned home with medical issues. We were made to feel like it was an "honor" to have them sacrifice their health for God. What the hell??? Digestive issues, nightmares, claustrophobia, migraines, tissue damage from running away from violence, and PTSD from an abusive companion, as well as emotional abuse from mission presidents. A 100 billion dollar organization should be on the hook for medical care. Or at very least, be required to be brutally honest about the damage a mission can cause. But then, the free labor might dry up. In my opinion it is not godly to knowingly allow young people to be harmed, and label and then praise them as "returning with honor." It sets them up to accept a lifetime of injury and abuse as holy, and sanctified. That's messed up.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts